THE SANDMAN [Series Review]: Bring Me A Dream.

Since its initial publication in 1989, writer Neil Gaiman‘s seminal, lyric The Sandman series has proven not only to be a resounding literary success — one that continues being spun-off and reintroduced to readers for nearly 30 years — but has also proven to be almost maddeningly difficult to adapt to a different medium (or, more specifically, to the screen). After so many false starts, delayed production, and years in development hell, Netflix has finally released its adaptation of the comic series.

This review follows just the first two episodes of the series’ 10-episode first season. Within seconds of the opening, we’re flown into the Dreaming — the nether-realm from whence all of humanity’s collective imagination dwells, and wherein Dream (Tom Sturridge) resides and rules. Some time early in 1900s, Roderick Burgess (Charles Dance), known to others as Magus, casts a spell hoping to imprison Death, and force him to return to life Roderick’s son. The binding spell goes wrong, however (as they’re wont to do!), and instead of Death, Roderick imprisons Dream, rendering him powerless for over ten years. During his time of imprisonment, others are able to usurp his realm, as Dream’s artifacts and tools are lost, stolen, and stray nightmares and entities are free to run amok.

Narratively, the series follows the first couple of issues of the comic almost to a T. Beat for beat, the series hits all the right moments, and seeing these characters in motion was something I’d always hoped for, but never thought I’d actually see. The poignant highs and melancholic lows are recreated here, all the while Gaiman’s imagination is left to grow and be dealt new breaths of life.

Being the first (and as such, only) actor to embody Dream (AKA Morpheus, AKA the titular Sandman) Tom Sturridge brings at first a detached aloofness to the role that takes some time to grow accustomed to. Even from the first episode to the second, he warms up considerably, playing with the role a bit more loosely as he grows more comfortable. He’s a lot to work with: not just with Dream’s other-humanness, but also the unfolding mythology and world-building the series embarks on.

Sturridge is great as Dream, as he has the look down pat, and the way he stares through humans — particularly Charles Dance early on — contemplating us, how alien we are compared to him, is compelling. The only gripe I have with him is his eyes: too accustomed have I become to Dream’s white-in-black eyes, the telltale mark of the Endless and their immortal lives. But understanding what Dream is, and not what he looks like, is what this series is about. And it makes him an absolutely fascinating character.

However.. this series suffers from what I’ve realized nearly all Netflix productions suffer from: a sleekness and cleanliness that is all too common with streaming premiere television shows. The Sandman just looks too damn sleek. I’m not sure exactly what cameras or gamut the show was shot in, but it is sadly no more or less common than anything else on streaming, and I think that that’s a shame. Too often reading the comic did I imagine the likes of Stan Brakhage or Guy Maddin composing shots and directing; the dream-like visages of a fantasy writer as imagined through the dreamy, washed-out, capital-F Filmmaker eyes of directors with something to say with how and with what they shot.

As beautiful as the imagery, and interesting as the story here is, The Sandman looks just like any other comic adaptation streaming in my Apple TV queue.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=83ClbRPRDXU

But I digress…The Sandman is a miracle to watch, knowing how long it took to adapt, how many false starts and hiccups it endured. And if it inspires a new generation of readers and writers, all the better for it. Here’s hoping Netflix breaks its annoying habit of cancelling its series at the end of its second seasons, right when most shows are finding their footing.

4/5 Jessamies.

-J.L. Caraballo

The Sandman is currently streaming on Netflix.

TOKYO GHOUL S [Review]: Ghoul – It’s What’s For Dinner.

Chris “Holy Spirit” Sawin
@evilbutters

I’m a casual Tokyo Ghoul fan. I’ve seen the first two seasons of the anime albeit several years apart in between viewings and I kind of like the second season despite it being known as a terrible adaptation for glossing over a good chunk of the manga. The 2017 live-action film had been on my watchlist forever and I finally got around to it after I was informed I’d be reviewing its sequel Tokyo Ghoul S. The previous Tokyo Ghoul film is actually the best live-action anime film I’ve seen thus far. In all honesty, that’s not saying much especially since the film still has some glaring issues but Masataka Kubota (13 Assassins, Rurouni Kenshin Part I: Origins) is such a satisfying Kaneki.

Tokyo Ghoul S feels like a different film in comparison. Fumika Shumizu retired from acting, so Maika Yamamoto replaced her as Touka Kirishima in the sequel. Kaneki is also suppressing his ghoulish desires throughout S and it’s absolutely frustrating. He’s psychotic and terrifying in the first film, but restrains himself by consuming nothing but coffee in S. He’s sluggish, can’t keep up with other ghouls, and is constantly getting his ass kicked throughout the film. Shota Matsuda is the sole reason to see Tokyo Ghoul S. Portraying Shu Tsukiyama, Matsuda is a ghoul also known as The Gourmet. He gets off on fine cuisine and extravagant delicacies. He eats human flesh, but it’s presented to him as a five star dish. Once he catches a whiff of Kaneki, then the hunt for the most exquisite gourmet meal begins.

The opening sequence is nasty and vile and undeniably everything I’ve ever wanted from a Tokyo Ghoul film. Tsukiyama rips a model’s eyeballs out of her head and consumes them like maraschino cherries. The camera goes dark after her eyes are plucked out of her skull before showing the perspective from the dangling eyeballs as Tsukiyama lowers them into his mouth. He then chucks her barely breathing carcass out of a skyscraper window where she plunges down onto a crowd of people on the ground below. Tsukiyama runs around in this weird mask that envelopes his entire head even encasing his impressively emo hairstyle. In that mask, he’s totally awesome; sniffing handkerchiefs with a few drops of Kaneki’s blood on them and is basically fueled by this orgasmic urge to consume Kaneki cuisine.

But once Tsukiyama takes that mask off, he isn’t nearly as impressive. The action sequences are really well done, especially the Touka/Tsukiyama fight where the camera placement feels like a Resident Evil boss battle. The special effects have always been one of the main downfalls of live-action anime films and that is no different for Tokyo Ghoul. There are times when the kagunes used by the ghouls look fantastic, but they tend to look less and less great the longer they’re showcased. The scenes in between Tsukiyama’s screen time are practically sleep-inducing. It feels like nothing eventful happens unless he’s around. Kaneki willingly and knowingly making himself weaker is rather infuriating, as well. These films are attempting to be more faithful to the manga and that’s fine if Kaneki refusing to eat and being a little turd about it is what occurred in the source material, but it doesn’t make it any less annoying.

That John Wick lighting tho.

I definitely recommend going out of your way to see the first Tokyo Ghoul live action film. It’s way better than it has any right to be. Tokyo Ghoul S is more of a rental suggestion though. The gore is outstanding, the action is entertaining, and Tsukiyama is a bad ass, but an eating fetish can only take a film so far. The film drudges along during setup sequences and long strings of dialogue. How a returning Nishio (Shunya Shiraishi) is able to get stabbed a dozen times and not die is somewhat entertaining in its own right. The Tokyo Ghoul live-action franchise has so much potential and hopefully it can get back on track if another film ever goes into development. 3/5 Pickled Eyeball Bibles.

-Chris Sawin