ANT-MAN AND THE WASP: QUANTUMANIA [ScreenX Review] – Wrath of Kang.

@TravMoody

To no surprise, the Marvel Cinematic Universe’s next full length-feature buzzes into theaters with high hopes and instant comparisons to Star Wars, Star Trek, and — let me put this one out there — Mass Effect. That’s all good company, except Peyton Reed‘s latest Ant-Man film whistles through the quantum zone faster than Ezra Miller’s pending cancelation.

Quantumania feels more like a Flash film, with plenty of quips, dynamite team-ups, a would-be/should-be Endgame-level villain (that Professor Zoom/Reverse Flash here is Kang) and superheroes of yesteryear getting more shine than usual. And the other half of the flick sees it more The Wizard of Oz in Space with Broccoli heads and sort of a Glob Herman (see Grant Morrison’s New X-Men). Also see: Hank Pym (Michael Douglas) in the Jay Garrick role, while Janet van Dyne (the infinitely gorgeous AF Michelle Pfeiffer) co-steals the whole damn show, literally.

You see, the elder Wasp had been stuck in the alternate world for three decades, with science and a daughter to blame for allowing “He Who Remains in the Quantum Realm” just enough room to plan for existential domination. Lang (the ageless Paul Rudd) repeats this process just minutes later and we have ourselves a Marvel movie. Jonathan Majors (Creed III) is absolutely wonderful as this variant of Kang, and I’m still not sure by the end if this variant of Kang is the Kang or a post-credits scene goes all deus ex machina to allow Ant-Man to go toe-to-toe with someone far superior and still…win. Yup. If you thought Kate Bishop whoopin’ Kingpin’s ass was bad, just wait til you see Scott Lang take down “The Conqueror”. Sure, he got help and super help from a far superior Ant-Man mind and a slew of (mostly giant) mechanic four-legged insects–but… come on.

For a long minute now, Majors’ Kang has been build up to the be the next Thanos– the next big thing to sit front and center on the throne of MCU baddies for years to come. And he still is; we have Avengers: The Kang Dynasty hitting theaters in 2025, and, again, both post-credits scene save us from not caring. But before you witness a gazillion fun variants of Kang (and HWR) in full control of Loki and Mobius’ mind-sets, we witness this superpowered Kang dude go down much easier than imagined. It really looked like Lang was going to die, and that he, Hope and Cassie really didn’t have a chance but… I guess having a Multiverse, Quantum Zone, Quantum Realm — QUANTUMANIA, BROTHER! — allows the titular characters to win and still keeps Kang (the idea) strong in the loss. But not strong enough. Kang shouldn’t have taken the “L” in this one if he’s to develop further into the chosen one.

But let’s take a (quantum) break from all that. You’re here for the eye-candy, right! The CGI! The 8K cinematography and cool stuff flying on screen! Thankfully, that’s stuff is mostly all a BR tasty treat, especially in panoramic view. If you’ve ever read one of my ScreenX reviews before, then you may remember that my biggest gripe is that only selective scenes use the 3-screen format. Thankfully, Reed had a lot of say in the format while shooting Quantumania, so we get more than usual. Most of the scenes where we see two or more actors conversating in a cool place (i.e. the Quantum Realm) receive the ScreenX treatment. Although there were a few pivotal scenes that took place in “Quantumania” that only utilized the primary screen.

My take on ScreenX for Antman (and The Wasp) 3 is that this particular format won’t phase most people, and if you sit too close then it really won’t phase you. I noticed that I was (maybe) the only one who cared to see how the frame was shot on the left and right panels. Most moviegoers are so accustomed to looking straight that I don’t think they remembered to look for another actor’s reaction from panel C and how some of the cool objects on these quantum planets appeared in 270-degrees on panel B. My particular favorite moment that utilized ScreenX greatly is Kang and his rotating, laser-blue rings; a lot of the discovery on the Realm’s planetary atmosphere looks mega rad in ScreenX. Another issue I have with the format in general is the definition (or lack thereof) on the left and right screens. I wish there was a way to make these side panels emulate at least 80% of the primary screen’s picture quality.

I’d like to tell you that Kathryn Newton is Quantumania‘s break-out hero and star, but she was…OK. Since Hasbro’s Marvel Legends made Cassie Lang the “BAF” (Build-A-Figure), I figured she was gonna rock it. Sure, she saves her dad (after causing this whole thing in the first place) and saves a slew of other strange allies, but her facial expression hardly altered all film. She’s a solid actress, but Cassie didn’t get me anymore excited for Young Avengers — at least nowhere to the level Kate has on Disney+’s Hawkeye, or even Tommy and Billy from the streaming service’s Wandavision. Evangeline Lilly isn’t even featured in one of the film’s trailers, which should have told you/us something already, and she has one very cool, defining moment at the end. Yet, her and Daddy Hank don’t have much to do but save Scott and make tons of room for mommy.

Lest we not forget Bill Murray, who was super campy and awesome as Krylar (yeah, don’t ask) and.. there for no reason at all but to seemingly chop it up with Michelle; the same could be said for M.O.D.O.K., whose slain Yellowjacket body, got all the hokey/jokey attention while that “Thanos level villain” was conveniently whisked away by ants. I’m torn on the Mechanized Organism Designed Only For Killing thing since it was an absolute creative and hilarious way to get Corey Stoll back in the trilogy as a Stay-Puft Marshmallow Darren Cross. It works, but charm it up to yet another non-threatening MCU villain.

Three’s Quantumany.

Jeff Loveness‘ screenplay is an ambitious one, as any screenplay about the Quantum Realm should be. It also definitely feels like it needs another 95 pages, as so much of this inaugural Fifth Phase feels like it was cut down to fit in some quippy characters that weren’t always quippy.  The lack of Michael Pena delivering a number of those jokes stands out. But in all, the movie has just enough of those classic Marvel Comics quips, cool battle scenery and imagery, likeable yet hollow superheroes and just enough Kang (and more than enough if you stay for the final two credits — A MUST) to make Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania a “just enough” good Marvel movie. It’s far from my favorite and pales in comparison to Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (and Thor: Love And Thunder, which I liked, but you didn’t so…), but it’s definitely another enjoyable time for MCU fans and families alike.

Thankfully for the future of the MCU, many of us just want more Kang.

Movie = 3.25/5
ScreenX = 3.75/5

Overall = 3.5/5 Baskin Robbins Love Potion #31

-Travis Moody

Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania hits theaters nationwide on Friday

ANT-MAN & THE WASP [Review]: Honey, I Shrunk the Critics.

“Reverend” Ryan Ford
@nayrdrof

While most Marvel fans are probably still reeling from the events of Infinity War, along comes a huge breath of fresh air packed in two fun-sized treats called Ant-Man and the Wasp. While there will be no spoilers for the film here, there may be a few nods and references to past MCU films so grab some Pez and a Pingo Dulce (Hulk reference) and let’s get small!

Though the heroes may not be actual size, the film itself is definitely larger than life. Director Peyton Reed capitalizes on what made the first movie a success, then turns the dial up to eleven in a couple specific areas. First and foremost, the humor is on point. Paul Rudd’s Scott Lang has become infamous in the superhero circles for his subtle “dad-joke” style of humor stemming from his child-like nature and the genuine sense of fun he has as a size-altering super. This go around, however, provides far more material for Rudd to show off his acting chops, which shine from start to finish. Again, no spoilers, but there is a scene where the team is trying to enter the quantum realm and only Scott Lang can provide the pertinent information, courtesy of a very unique source. It is in this scene that the sum of the movie is defined by the parts. Relevant information is disseminated, the stakes are raised and a time limited for success is established — all while being one of the funniest moments of the film.

Ant-Man and the Wasp succeeds in a way that perhaps no other Marvel movie does. Sticking with comedy, there are a few other characters that are given more material, most notably Michael Pena’s Luis. Nearly every scene he appears in is comedic gold. And, as balance had been previously mentioned, the amount of action given to the supporting cast juxtaposes the fantastically humorous scenarios in a way that is totally satisfying. David Dastmalchian and Tip “TI” Harris who return as Kurt and Dave, respectively, shine as a result of this formula. Yet the scene-stealer of the film is emphatically Randall Park as FBI Agent Jimmy Woo. While he was awkwardly funny in every scene, he may have been the most accurate representation of an FBI Agent on film, even down to his perplexity over sleight-of-hand magic.

It’ll be fine; no one will notice…

As for the remainder of the star-studded cast, their purpose is the emotional variables factored into the equation, so let’s solve for X. We’ll begin with Michelle Pfeiffer. While her role is somewhat miniscule (pun intended), it is a critical one as she portrays the original Wasp, Janet van Dyne. As a side note, it is nice to finally see Janet in the MCU seeing as she was the one in the comic books responsible for giving the Avengers their name. Used mostly in flashback sequences, Pfeiffer’s character serves as more of a grounding unit for the lightning rods that are both Ant-Men and the current Wasp. She brings an emotional grace to the film in a way only Michelle Pfeiffer can. As previously stated, most of her scenes are from the past which means the de-aging technology used in Civil War and the first Ant-Man movie are put to use once again. Not so much on Pfeiffer, but brutally obvious on Michael Douglas. It works well; it’s just that the star actress has aged considerably better than her co-star.

Speaking of which, Michael Douglas’ Hank Pym had a far more dynamic arc than just the crotchety old man from the first film. With brief allusions to his character’s past — and that of the original Wasp, for that matter — Douglas was able to build off a larger, more solid foundation to bring a rounded and whole character to life. There was even an instance that touched upon the madness of Hank Pym, much like he is portrayed in the comics, but not quite that crazy. He didn’t go full Nancy Pelosi, but close. Another portal that sheds light on this topic is Laurence Fishburne as Bill Foster. From the pages of the comics, Foster is known as Goliath and becomes a version of Giant Man for the Avengers, yet does not reach that level during the course of the film. Rather, he is like the Bill Gates to Pym’s Steve Jobs. They have a relationship supported by the pillars of mutual respect and deep hatred, much like the two sorcerers of Silicon Valley.

When you acquire the wolf grey shader in Destiny 2.

Yet, there is another relationship “Fostered” by Bill and that is with Ghost, played by Hannah John-Kamen. Her performance as the phase-shifting thief is fully justified while having room to explore more of the character’s motivations in future films, should Marvel so decide. That can be said as the movie does not have a clear-cut enemy. Sonny Birch, as played by Walton Goggins, would perhaps be the closest the film comes to a real villain, yet the actions of Ghost are far worse. Ghost is not the mustache-twirling villain that one would find in a Red Skull or Yellowjacket, however, but more of an antagonist constantly caught between a bad decision and a worse one. Ghost has enough empathetic moments to explain her actions, though not quite on the level of Killmonger, nor redemptive enough as in the case of Loki. Nevertheless, the possibility remains to bring her back should Marvel opt for a Young Avengers movie in the future.

One certainty of who should appear in a YA movie is Cassie Lang. Played brilliantly by Abby Ryder Forston, enough winks and nods through her character’s exposition lend credence to an appearance by Stature, a critical member of the comic book Civil War. However, what Cassie Lang does the best is highlight the relationship between father and daughter, which is a pretty central theme throughout the entire film. In fact, there are three distinct aspects of this relationship, told through separate pairings. Bridging from the reconciliation that happened at the end of the first film — minus a few setbacks that occurred during the events of MCU Civil War — Hope and Hank have put the fun back in dysfunctional. Thanks to the tone of the film, both father and daughter are able to have emotionally fulfilling moments without diverting into tear-jerking drama. And that brings us to the true star of the film — the Wasp.

Ant-Man & the Wasp is a rom-com for toughguys.

Evangeline Lilly absolutely killed it as the Wasp. There is no argument. She wins. From a performance standpoint, Lilly was able to be the ass-kicking straight man who had perfectly timed quips with the exact emotional need. Almost like she was Harold Ramis to Rudd’s Bill Murray if Ramis was also Chuck Norris. This juggling act delivered a superheroine that is incredibly intelligent, deceptively dangerous and fantastically funny, all while wearing a super sexy skin-tight suit. With wings. And blasters. In short, the one question that will be asked at the end of the film is “why haven’t we seen her sooner?”. To date, the Wasp is probably the best female superhero we’ve seen out of Marvel, which will put some pressure on Captain Marvel later in 2019. Looking to the future, it is a necessity that this Ultimate-inspired Wasp join the Avengers and kick far more ass than Black Widow, which she could.

As far as the film goes as a whole, it was a lot of fun. The fight sequences were excellently choreographed, the chase scenes were intense and well filmed, even the scoring hit the right notes. This is the type of movie to put on when it is a gray depressing day and spirits need to be lifted. Tonally and thematically, Ant-Man & the Wasp is like a combination of Lethal Weapon meets Honey I Shrunk the Kids. It had the throwback nostalgia of a late 80’s early 90’s buddy action rom-com while still maintaining a place in the pre-established universe. Given that the style of humor is far different than in the Guardians films or Thor: Ragnarok, Ant-Man 2 still has the most jokes and visual gags of any MCU entry. And if you’re wondering how this film ties in with the rest, make sure you buzz your way through all the credits. 4/5 Bibles.

-Ryan Ford

Catch Marvel Studios’ Ant-Man & The Wasp in theaters everywhere July 6th.

ANT-MAN [Review]: Did Marvel Make the ‘Wright’ Decision?

Ever since Iron Man (#neverforget) redefined the modern superhero movie and raised the bar for every flick of the like that has come after, fans have went into every Marvel Studios release comparing the newest one to the last.

With the studios latest, Peyton Reed’s Ant-Man, that notion has finally become a near impossible task.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcd9i-qNz4Q

Not only did this film have to overcome being billed as Peyton Reed’s Ant-Man instead of Edgar Wright’s Ant-Man, but it also had the quandary of being released a little over two months after Joss Whedon’s Avengers: Age of Ultron. As for how it stacks up, that is a very complex thing to answer.

"Salvation" Ryan Scott @radioadventure
“Salvation” Ryan Scott
@radioadventure

For those who are unaware, the plot of the film centers around Hank Pym (Michael Douglas), the original Ant-Man, trying to prevent his former protege Darren Cross (The Strain‘s Corey Stoll) from unleashing his Pym particle technology on the world, which is capable of shrinking a human being to the size of, oh I don’t know, let’s say an ant. To do so, he enlists the help of criminal Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) and his daughter Hope Van Dyne (The Desolation of Smaug‘s Evangeline Lilly) to plan an elaborate heist in order to prevent the power from falling into the wrong hands.

Wright had been attached to this film ever since Marvel Studios made their debut at San Diego Comic Con back in 2006, and it had been rumored for years that it would be a heist film as well as something unlike anything else we had seen to date in a superhero film. Even without Wright at the helm, that still holds true, though his DNA is still all over the place.

We love you too, Edgar.
We love you too, Edgar.

Reed does an admirable job, a very difficult job at that, stepping in at the last second to take on a project that was already full speed ahead and nearly ready to shoot. Not to mention that at the time, Wright was arguably the only reason anyone wanted to see Ant-Man of all characters get their own film. That being said, it is hard to imagine anyone who knew the history of this film’s production going in didn’t leave at least wondering what could have been to a degree.

There is absolutely nothing bad about this film. In fact, as someone who honestly could have cared less about the character of Ant-Man going in, I can say it was a very enjoyable film. As great as it is seeing Hulk, Thor and the gang destroying cities over and over again, it is refreshing to see something totally different. The MCU will need different to stay fresh. Ant-Man is exactly that.

Invisible "creeping" only a button touch away? I'm in.
Invisible “creeping” only a button touch away? I’m in.

For a certain breed of comic book fan, seeing this character brought to life is exhilarating, I’m sure. It is the type of thing that makes long time nerds look around and say “We did it guys! We Won!” Ant-Man would have never passed for a blockbuster superhero even three or four years ago. It is a testament to the good faith that Marvel Studios has built. That being said, your average movie goer may have a hard time with certain aspects of the film, as it is reaching a bit more than some of the previous entries in the MCU. There is really no way around it, a shrinking man who can talk to ants is weird.

However, this is not Guardians of the Galaxy. Though Ant-Man is a welcome addition to the MCU it doesn’t quite feel like the left field home run that some of us thought it could be. There is that intangible quality that makes something truly outstanding that never quite fleshes itself out. Could Wright have been that intangible quality? We will never know, but there will always be the “what if?” when this film is talked about.

So...that's your "super power"?
So…that’s your “super power”?

Being that this is a film about a shrinking man and a robbery that is aided by ants, the action sequences are pretty unique and the creative force behind this movie allowed themselves to have some fun with it, which was the right way to go. This simply wouldn’t work if it were taking itself too seriously.

In any case, it should be noted that the entire cast of the film from top to bottom is pitch perfect. Stoll is very good as the bad guy, even though he did suffer from the slightly underdeveloped villain syndrome that is often the case with movies that have a lot going on.

Rudd earns his place among The Avengers and it will be great to see him team up with everyone (or at least some of everyone) next year in Captain America: Civil War. Lilly could be the female heroine we’ve been waiting for and her performance was great. Though, Douglas was the real standout in this movie and Marvel fans should be absolutely thrilled to have an actor of his caliber playing Pym. Some fans were upset that the MCU’s Ant-Man wasn’t going to be Pym, but when you see the performance Douglas turns in, you’ll understand that decision.

I think it is safe to say so, Scott.

The film offers some great nods to fans of the greater Marvel Universe without detracting from what is going on with the plot too much. There are hints of what’s to come, fun inside jokes and more things of the sort, but it never feels out of place.

To try and rank Ant-Man against the other 11 films in the MCU would be a pointless endeavor. At this point it is like trying to compare pizza to whisky. They are far too different to compare to one another, but can absolutely be enjoyed together. Overall, this film was a gamble that paid off. Some people will love it, and others will just like it.

Also, there are two post credit scenes. It is better not to say anything about them other than you should definitely stay for both.

3.5/5 Pym Particles.

The Weekly Worship: MATT FRACTION’s got comics “Uatu” read.

Yup, it’s witty; sure, it’s typical of our blog headlines; and, uh-huh, you bet we stole it. Don’t be surprised if half the comic industry starts stealing other elements from Matt Fraction in the coming weeks, as well.

This man is on fire.

But, before I go on to cover a pair of this week’s Marvelous works from Matty Frac, let’s talk about sex — Sex Criminals, that is. Just trying to explain this indie gem from Image is freaky enough (you should see the faces on some of my coworkers), never mind the actual read.

Never a dull moment in the VIP room at Hemmingway’s, that’s for sure.

The hypnotic, less scandalous than you’d imagine comic is as stated: what if you had the power to freeze time with a.. uh.. well.. *gulp* orgasm*? Before this article gets too 50 Shades of Moody on ya, I’d be lying to the congregation if I didn’t admit having such thoughts (or powers!) But…onto the comic, yes? Uh, get it?

Onto.
The.
Comic.

Ick is right. Sex Criminals is sort of like “what would you do with a million dollars?” topics except it’s more “what’s the damn best way to obtain a million dollars?”

Sex! Of course.

These freakypages offer more sentiment than you’d think, also. If you can see past the title and the whimsical images on the cover, Sex Criminals is an intelligent, surprisingly relatable yarn. There’s a damn good reason why Suzie does why she does (although it’s “barely legal”), and there’s no doubt tons of geeks are going to shout out “that’s me!” with Jon’s everyday rage (only without his power, though, weirdo). And the comic has Sex Cops. Say that again right along with me now…

Sex Criminals #1-#4 = 3.75 (out of 5).. Sex Criminals Comics?